IT'S UP TO YOU..............

[Beejyman]

am i right in thinking that if you click add foe in your user control panel that you wont get to see any of his posts, its a facility that visordown use and works well, last xmas they had a troll called orange socks, 2000 posts in a week when you clicked on ignore you werent able to see his posts,did make some threads a bit weird but at least you never saw his insults and all the crap he posted

Done

[billinom8s]

It's a troll. It's number one objective is to grab attention, followed by sowing discord and generally souring forums. It is not here because it likes bikes or has any interest in getting along with others.
Your good intentions towards it will be abused by it.
It is a thoroughly unpleasant creature as it has already demonstrated.
Most of it's writings are taken from reading bike mag articles.
It is a steaming pile of turd and is best treated like one.

Moderators take note.

If you are going to ban someone for being insulting, then the rule has to apply to all does it not ?

I've never resorted to writing in such a way as the person above, but yet I'm the one who gets a flee in my ear about abusive behaviour.

Go figure

One rule for some, and another rule for others it seems

I believe the comment above was a statement, nowhere on the post is an individual mentioned. It was a general comment on internet trolls. If you believe it was directed at you surely that denotes something about the way you view yourself. Oh and if you are not happy with the way the site is moderated you can always leave and find another site. I see by the members list you are not a paid up member so have no obligation to stay or post. Have a nice day.

[ridenut]

It's a troll. It's number one objective is to grab attention, followed by sowing discord and generally souring forums. It is not here because it likes bikes or has any interest in getting along with others.
Your good intentions towards it will be abused by it.
It is a thoroughly unpleasant creature as it has already demonstrated.
Most of it's writings are taken from reading bike mag articles.
It is a steaming pile of turd and is best treated like one.

Moderators take note.

If you are going to ban someone for being insulting, then the rule has to apply to all does it not ?

I've never resorted to writing in such a way as the person above, but yet I'm the one who gets a flee in my ear about abusive behaviour.

Go figure

One rule for some, and another rule for others it seems

I believe the comment above was a statement, nowhere on the post is an individual mentioned. It was a general comment on internet trolls. If you believe it was directed at you surely that denotes something about the way you view yourself. Oh and if you are not happy with the way the site is moderated you can always leave and find another site. I see by the members list you are not a paid up member so have no obligation to stay or post. Have a nice day.

So you are saying that this user was definitely NOT referring to me, YES ?

[Lady g]

So you are saying that this user was definitely NOT referring to me, YES ?

It was neither confirmed nor denied.

[billinom8s]

there are no names or user names mentioned are there ?

[ridenut]

there are no names or user names mentioned are there ?

No, but that doesn't answer my question, which was, are you saying that the post was not referring to me.

That's a simple yes or no question.

[greg]

It's a troll. It's number one objective is to grab attention, followed by sowing discord and generally souring forums. It is not here because it likes bikes or has any interest in getting along with others.
Your good intentions towards it will be abused by it.
It is a thoroughly unpleasant creature as it has already demonstrated.
Most of it's writings are taken from reading bike mag articles.
It is a steaming pile of turd and is best treated like one.

Moderators take note.

If you are going to ban someone for being insulting, then the rule has to apply to all does it not ?

I've never resorted to writing in such a way as the person above, but yet I'm the one who gets a flee in my ear about abusive behaviour.

Go figure

One rule for some, and another rule for others it seems

If the cap fits, wear it.

[Lady g]

there are no names or user names mentioned are there ?

No, but that doesn't answer my question, which was, are you saying that the post was not referring to me.

That's a simple yes or no question.

How can he answer that, numbnuts, he didn't write the original post, did he??? Dumb ass.

[ridenut]

I believe the comment above was a statement, nowhere on the post is an individual mentioned. It was a general comment on internet trolls.

So just to confirm then, that you do not believe that the post was aimed specifically at me, and was a generalisation.

Yes or No.

[Lady g]

I believe the comment above was a statement, nowhere on the post is an individual mentioned. It was a general comment on internet trolls.

So just to confirm then, that you do not believe that the post was aimed specifically at me, and was a generalisation.

Yes or No.

And here with go again with the demands for answers to stoopid questions.

yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaawwwwwwwwwwnnnnnnnnnnnnnn.

[deej]

what do you think he was talking about

as much as your posts make you out to be a complete knob i admire your determination/stupidity in returning to here,in some odd way you bring a smile to my face and make me realise how normal,friendly and helpful 99% of people on swb are. if you dont want to meet people and make friends can i suggest you leave quietly and close the door behind you

[billinom8s]

I believe the comment above was a statement, nowhere on the post is an individual mentioned. It was a general comment on internet trolls.

So just to confirm then, that you do not believe that the post was aimed specifically at me, and was a generalisation.

Yes or No.

Yes a statement of fact no not aimed at you. Why would it be aimed at you ? What kind of person would make verbal attacks and slanderous comments about persons they do not know ?

[Cheese Monkey]

What kind of person would make verbal attacks and slanderous comments about persons they do not know ?

[ridenut]

there are no names or user names mentioned are there ?

No, but that doesn't answer my question, which was, are you saying that the post was not referring to me.

That's a simple yes or no question.

How can he answer that, numbnuts, he didn't write the original post, did he??? Dumb ass.

Are you reading the posts ?

He said quite clearly that the post was a generalisation and implied it wasn't aimed at me.

Just look back you plank.

I'm just asking for a definite yes or no

[ridenut]

I believe the comment above was a statement, nowhere on the post is an individual mentioned. It was a general comment on internet trolls.

So just to confirm then, that you do not believe that the post was aimed specifically at me, and was a generalisation.

Yes or No.

Yes a statement of fact no not aimed at you.?

Good, thanks for clearing that up.

So ladyG.

It seems he does know after all