My mistake.Lady G wrote:Ummm, the avatar belongs to Bambam, not greg..![]()
Sorry Greg.
Very sad though don't you think ?
A bit childish ?
Moderator: Staff
My mistake.Lady G wrote:Ummm, the avatar belongs to Bambam, not greg..![]()
Stately wrote:My mistake.Lady G wrote:Ummm, the avatar belongs to Bambam, not greg..![]()
Sorry Greg.
Very sad though don't you think ?
A bit childish ?

Stately wrote:
I'm very dubious about someone who has to post up a womans arse as an avatar.
Is that to re enforce your masculinity and show us all what a mans man you are![]()
To me, it smacks of a very sad little man, probably still living at home with Mum and Dad, with a passion for model railways
Sounds about right up his street that, he's probably never seen a womans arse though, no self respecting woman would want such a boring tw*t inside her while he spouts his incessant shite. Rohypnol is his best friendTLS-Moose wrote:Stately wrote:
I'm very dubious about someone who has to post up a womans arse as an avatar.
Is that to re enforce your masculinity and show us all what a mans man you are![]()
To me, it smacks of a very sad little man, probably still living at home with Mum and Dad, with a passion for model railways
EeeekAre you stalking BamBam now too - you seem to know him very well
![]()
![]()
I know I'm guilty of a few things here, but I'd never sink so low and post such offensive drivvle.Johnnyb wrote:he's probably never seen a womans arse though, no self respecting woman would want such a boring tw*t inside her while he spouts his incessant [censored]. Rohypnol is his best friend
[/quote]I know I'm guilty of a few things here, but I'd never sink so low and post such offensive drivvle.
I suggest if you do not have the intelligence or wit to post anything more elloquent, that you stay out of intelligent debate, where it is clear that you are totally out of your depth.
There are females on this forum, for whome you clearly have no respect, judging by your attitude.
I further suggest that if you insist on doing this, you send it via PM and keep it away from public view, you mindless moron
You sure about that ?Mike Rowley wrote: Drivel not drivvle. Elequent not elloquent.
Its a public forum where you air your thoughts and views, i mean we have been suffering because you have been airing yours non stop for the last few weeks, and just where was it direspectfull to the ladies who frequent these forums, i made no comment about the female form or their minds or abilities just suggested that to my mind i find it hard to believe that any lady would let such an irritating and outspoken knobber as you anywhere near and i appear to have hit a nerve............Stately wrote:I know I'm guilty of a few things here, but I'd never sink so low and post such offensive drivvle.Johnnyb wrote:he's probably never seen a womans arse though, no self respecting woman would want such a boring tw*t inside her while he spouts his incessant [censored]. Rohypnol is his best friend
I suggest if you do not have the intelligence or wit to post anything more elloquent, that you stay out of intelligent debate, where it is clear that you are totally out of your depth.
There are females on this forum, for whome you clearly have no respect, judging by your attitude.
I further suggest that if you insist on doing this, you send it via PM and keep it away from public view, you mindless moron
No not at all, but it is bad form to talk about Women in that way, as well you know, and judging by your response there, I'd say it was me that's hit a nerveJohnnyb wrote:Its a public forum where you air your thoughts and views, i mean we have been suffering because you have been airing yours non stop for the last few weeks, and just where was it direspectfull to the ladies who frequent these forums, i made no comment about the female form or their minds or abilities just suggested that to my mind i find it hard to believe that any lady would let such an irritating and outspoken knobber as you anywhere near and i appear to have hit a nerve............![]()
![]()
Maybe, but I've never once had to resort to posting something as crude as your earlier post.Johnnyb wrote:You certainly are an odd person...........
Stately wrote:You sure about that ?Mike Rowley wrote: Drivel not drivvle. Elequent not elloquent.
Actually I think you'll find it's ELOQUENT![]()
Looks like your spelling is as bad as mine.
Stones and greenhouses indeed
Just the beginning...........Stately wrote:Maybe, but I've never once had to resort to posting something as crude as your earlier post.Johnnyb wrote:You certainly are an odd person...........
Hmmm.Mike Rowley wrote:Stately wrote:You sure about that ?Mike Rowley wrote: Drivel not drivvle. Elequent not elloquent.
Actually I think you'll find it's ELOQUENT![]()
Looks like your spelling is as bad as mine.
Stones and greenhouses indeed
Spelling is fine, typing is suspect.I grew up in an age before computers (we had slide rules) therefore good education - lousy IT skills.
Diametric opposites.