BIKE STOLEN, PLYMOUTH !!!

Chewie · Post by **Chewie** » Jul 28th, '06, 10:32

Well that was the look i was going for Princess..

Jewell · Post by **Jewell** » Jul 28th, '06, 10:38

well it worked then you little fag.

Jewell · Post by **Jewell** » Jul 28th, '06, 10:42

also....

baskie · Post by **baskie** » Jul 28th, '06, 10:45

Chewie · Post by **Chewie** » Jul 28th, '06, 10:47

That's brilliant.. and to think.. all those pictures were designed to be used against people like you Princess...

baskie · Post by **baskie** » Jul 28th, '06, 10:49

Chewie wrote:That's brilliant.. and to think.. all those pictures were designed to be used against people like you Princess...

watters · Post by **watters** » Jul 28th, '06, 11:21

baskie wrote:
Jon B wrote:The reason there is no insurance is because Baskie doesn't have a licence.
i had a lisence to drive it and insurance but was only 3rd party. cant claim on his insurance becuase he wasnt insured on it anymore. and yes jon B and chewie i did have a lisence. so there we go boys

doesnt the owner of the bike have to be insured on it so that your 3rd party insurance can ride it?

Jon B · Post by **Jon B** » Jul 28th, '06, 11:27

Yeah that's right Watters.

Jewell · Post by **Jewell** » Jul 28th, '06, 11:44

Chewie wrote:That's brilliant.. and to think.. all those pictures were designed to be used against people like you Princess...

good comeback

baskie · Post by **baskie** » Jul 28th, '06, 12:30

watters wrote:
baskie wrote:
Jon B wrote:The reason there is no insurance is because Baskie doesn't have a licence.
i had a lisence to drive it and insurance but was only 3rd party. cant claim on his insurance becuase he wasnt insured on it anymore. and yes jon B and chewie i did have a lisence. so there we go boys

doesnt the owner of the bike have to be insured on it so that your 3rd party insurance can ride it?

no, only stipulation is aslong as my lisence entitled me to ride it, and that i dont own the bike. thats what my policy says anyways