Page 3 of 3

Re: The 996 is dead

Posted: Apr 26th, '05, 17:40
by age
yes furry it is the crankcase :cry: I can see inside the gearbox :lol:


Yes it's going to cost me big time :shock:



No to a TL 1000 motor :lol: :lol:

Posted: Apr 26th, '05, 18:47
by furry
Ahhhhhhhhh not so good :(

TL motor not the cheepest option.... the whole total would work out to 1500-2000... still be the fastest 996 out there though :D

Anyway I know the "oh shit"/gutted feeling... be smiling again once it's fixed though :)

Re: The 996 is dead

Posted: Apr 30th, '05, 15:38
by bish777
good reason to see if we can get the bike engineering boffins to invent an ultra light shaft drive.... Bloody chains-my gixxer 1100 has anhilated another one......

Re: The 996 is dead

Posted: Apr 30th, '05, 17:11
by Jay
Nitemare mate:(

Posted: Apr 30th, '05, 18:17
by furry
bish what do you expect when you ride a chain eating monster like yours :D (GSXR1100 = Busa's Daddy lol)

I notice you got the slabside model...just wondered...do they handle any better than the later ones...I went on a 1996 one (last ones they made) and going round corners was scary as fooook lol

Posted: Apr 30th, '05, 20:47
by DynaMight
I would hazzard a guess that they handle even worse, Unless setup properly.

My Gix750 was fine on the corners.

Posted: Apr 30th, '05, 21:57
by furry
I've also been on a gsxr750 WN...it's a different beast m8...nothing like what the 1100 was on corners...prolly reason why when the SRAD series came along, they kept the 750 idea but dropped the 1100 for the Busa and then the gsxr1000.

Re: The 996 is dead

Posted: May 1st, '05, 20:51
by jonoono69
sorry to here about the bike age,
bad news alroud.
:cry: :cry: :cry:

Posted: May 4th, '05, 18:21
by CBR_LOVER
Any news on the Duke, Age???

Re: The 996 is dead

Posted: May 4th, '05, 18:33
by age
hope to pick it up a week on sat mate 8)

Posted: May 4th, '05, 18:35
by CBR_LOVER
excellent news - i was without mine for a week - bad enough,u must be climbing the walls by now!!!