Stately wrote:I see.
Must be my computer then - I'm on dial up and some things can take a while to load.
Never mind.
So from page 38
Could you quote the part that states that "most bike accidents are caused by drivers"
Cheers
Its a pie chart.
Moderator: Staff
Stately wrote:I see.
Must be my computer then - I'm on dial up and some things can take a while to load.
Never mind.
So from page 38
Could you quote the part that states that "most bike accidents are caused by drivers"
Cheers

billinom8s wrote:how many of those involved in these stats were women that had been riding over 3 years?
Cheese Monkey wrote:The motorcycle accident database recorded who was to blame for the 1,790
accidents, splitting the accidents into five main categories. Rider 1 was the
motorcyclist involved in the accident. Driver 2 was the second vehicle involved in
the accident. The third category was where a pedestrian was to blame. The remaining two categories were joint/combined blame and other/unknown. The split
can be seen in Table 6.
Table 6: Primary blame for accidents on the motorcycle accident database
Primary blame No. of accidents % total (n ¼ 1,790)
Rider - 754 - 42.1%
Driver - 788 - 44.0%
Pedestrian - 35 - 1.9
Unclear/combined - 165 - 9.2
Other/not known - 48 - 2.7
Table 6 shows an even split of responsibility for accidents with driver 2 and rider 1
to blame in around 40% of the accidents, respectively. However, just under a third of
accidents suffered by motorcyclists did not involve a second vehicle and if these are
removed from the figures a slightly different picture emerges, as can be seen in
Table 7
Table 7: Primary blame for accidents on the motorcycle accident database after
the removal of single vehicle accidents
Primary blame No. of accidents % total (n ¼ 1,228)
Rider - 269 - 21.9%
Driver - 699 - 56.9%
Pedestrian - 4 - 0.3%
Unclear/combined - 144 - 11.72%
So in both cases, more accidents are caused by car drivers than motorcyclists. Direct copy and paste. So please be quiet
No I'm not (whoever the hell Andals is)scorpion wrote:Now why would it be aimed at you...you're not Andyals are ya?
[Censored] lmao. No evidence of this type can ever be conclusive if you look at it that way. Car vs bike blame is attributed to the car more than the bike, doesnt matter whether its a few percent, it still is. Admit that you were wrong. It does take a man to admit that he was wrong I appreciate that. I'm wondering whether you are or just some keyboard warrior pussyStately wrote:Nothing conclusive there.
For a start this study is seven years old, which is an eternity in terms of statistical analysis.
Also, the study clearly concludes that blame is generally shared equally, give or take a few percent, which is what I said earlier.